Understanding mistakes or exploring creativity?

This post from 'reckon' that I'm following on twitter is fascinating in itself. Does the creative use of language generate different changes in brain activity in the reader or listener? Can the creative use of language casue measurable, physical and profound effects in the human brain? The subject for this experiment is Shakespeare, who had a habit of using nouns as verbs or adjectives for example. These have an 'electric' effect on the reader/listener, as the unusual or even unique use of these words jump out at them. To find out what they did, read about it here.

But what also struck me in reading this was the fact that so many questions are framed around mistakes, incapacities and problems. There's nothing wrong with this in iteslf, but there are perhaps so many more wonderful discoveries to be made by framing questions around positive things in the way this experiment does. Is this down to some innate firefighting, or crisis-response human condition? To quote (or, more precisely, paraphrase) one of those motivational speakers, 'if only we could harness our breathtaking capacities to survive in the face of danger, and use them to imagine and achieve a positive peaceful future, what wonder could we see in the world?

Del.icio.us

1. QDOS

   identify and manage your digital online presence - currently in beta testing

   to data technology digital identity ... saved by 32 other people

2. SEER Centre home of ROCKDUST

   to environment farming ... saved by 4 other people

3. GoodURLBadURL.com

   to blog branding marketing URL "web address" ... saved by 93 other people

4. The Whale Hunt / A storytelling experiment / by Jonathan Harris

   to art inspiration nature Photography storytelling Travel ... saved by 98 other people

5. The Work of Jonathan Harris

   to art Artists collaboration community ideas innovation inspiration people projects Research Photography photos timeline heartbeat ... saved by 87 other people

6. Locavores

   People trying to eat food grown and harvested within 100 miles of their homes for one month. Locavores is OED's word of 2007

   to change community development environment farming organic sustainability ... saved by 101 other people

7. Wikia - Wikis from Wikia - Join the best wiki communities

   to links wiki information sharing Search directory encyclopedia free elearning reference Research collaboration community ... saved by 2142 other people

Drawing for planning and collaboration

If you're not familiar with 'Change This', I recommend a look through the manifestos; there are some real gems. Today I came across this one, which is proving interesting. Have look. What do you think?

How long does it take?

This is one generation later than I first came across the idea at school in 1975. And it still only includes environmental agencies. An ecosystems approach without economic and social agencies? How long until the whole picture is seen and understood, before we see the world in its full and glorious interdependence, and before we are able to say with any confidence that we will not destroy ourselves?

http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/natres/eco-actionp.htm

The story of stuff

There are many interesting and challenging ways to look at our shocking consumer society. This is one of them. I was particularly struck by the statement of intent by the US in the 1950s to establish consuming as the ultimate purpose of their country. Well, they succeeded; it's a shame they didn't choose something else more ... more humane, as their ultimate purpose. Maybe it's not too late, even though there are few signs of any change of strategy in Bali.

Pilot projects and real "failures"

(From yourte.com)

I've been mentoring someone over the past few weeks as they start to put together a project plan. The sort of work I take particular delight in, since each project is different, and it's always a two-way exchange of skills, experience and inspiration.

The project has evolved from a successful one she ran over three years; one that turned sour for a number of reasons that I can't really go into. However that experience have had profound effects on her and her project. (I'll have to give her a pseudonym, her and she is just too annoying - how about Sue.)

What kind of effects? Well we can start with some negative ones like fear, an aversion to unpleasant local politics, and a caution about operating as an association. But on the positive side, Sue has a much strengthened passion to provide the services for children that are still needed and no longer being met. And of course a long list of lessons learned.

One of my thoughts has been comparing this experience with a pilot project. I have also recently been involved in a project that has succeeded a pilot project that I was not involved with. Although not comparing like with like, I believe there is a profound difference between the experience of a first project and that of a pilot project.

The idea of pilot projects at least is that mistakes and failures are sanctioned. A second bite at the cherry is generally expected, although the role of pilot projects is also to demonstrate unworkable ideas, and so some should have no subsequent project.

With a first project however, I would say there is a far higher degree of engagement and commitment to success. No second chance is expected or planned for: the necessity of survival and the desire for success are immanent, pervasive drivers. And failure is sometimes a very costly experience. In Sue's case, the fall-out has lasted for over a year, both for the project and for her personally. The hardship and courage she and others involved have demonstrated has been an inspiration. The lessons they learned are visceral and profound, and making a noticable difference to our work now.

So one question that occurs is whether it is possible to make pilot projects more like first projects? If so, would it be a good thing, given the apparent level of pain associated with it?

My current view, and one that we're building in to the planning, is that this project will benefit from planned evolution. Start with the minimum viable proposition, and adapt and grow according to changing needs, constraints and visions. This approach includes identifying when the 'first/pilot' project is completed to take the opportunity to review it plan it and do the next thing. It isn't a first "one and only project", but is also something like a pilot that has the same reality score as the real thing.